Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
Date
Msg-id 20080221191448.GG18657@crankycanuck.ca
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default  ("D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:43:27AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> often. It is poor implementation and proof that the theoretical
> security implications that are being brought up in this thread are far
> from the practical reality.

"We have this hole over here for historical reasons, so let's maybe open a
new one over there"?

A



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Roberts, Jon"
Date:
Subject: Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default