On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:11:05PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> > Let's put PL/PgSQL in template1 by default, as some downstream
> > packagers are already doing. If someone really must remove it,
> > they can still do that.
>
> This has been proposed before, and rejected before. Have you got
> any new arguments?
The longer it's been since the last vuln in PL/PgSQL, the harder it is
to argue for having it not be there by default.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
