Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
Date
Msg-id 20080219153057.0eea830a@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:13:53 -0500
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:

> I am having trouble locating the previous thread - can someone please 
> point me at it?

I am having trouble finding one that makes a cohesive argument against
but here we go:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2000-05/msg00215.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-04/msg00952.php

Of course there are tons of results of users wondering why we don't
offer such as simple and useful feature.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHu2ayATb/zqfZUUQRAmL7AJoCQyNmbLIbZNXG9JjMQu2ax/vRJQCfcevF
TF6TzTSr/1ep8PuSNMcGK2g=
=bFqN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Permanent settings