Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Douglas J Hunley
Subject Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
Date
Msg-id 200802191435.58720.doug@hunley.homeip.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
Responses Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
List pgsql-performance
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 14:28:54 Dave Cramer wrote:
> shared buffers is *way* too small as is effective cache
> set them to 2G/6G respectively.
>
> Dave

pardon my ignorance, but is this in the context of a restore only? or 'in
general'?

--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
http://doug.hunley.homeip.net

Don't let Kirk show you what he affectionately calls the "Captain's Log"

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?