Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
Date
Msg-id 20080211211812.GF13934@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan  (Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andy Colson escribió:
> Robert Treat wrote:

>> Would a pre-requisite for any new SCM to be anointed as *the* new SCM 
>> that the buildfarm can be reconfigured to run with it?  Unless there is 
>> an SCM2CVS option available I suppose... how many SCM's support such a 
>> thing? 
>
> I dont think the buildfarm needs to require CVS.  The code can be  
> changed in the buildfarm to just run 'svn up' or 'git up and go' (sorry,  
> never used git so I had to guess at the command :-) )  right?

In fact I don't see why the buildfarm couldn't be configurable to use
whatever tool/repo the user sees fit.  It's easy enough to detect
whether a checked out copy is SVN or git or whatever, and act
accordingly.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andy Colson
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan
Next
From: Mark Mielke
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL 8.4 development plan