Re: configurability of OOM killer - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Decibel!
Subject Re: configurability of OOM killer
Date
Msg-id 20080208173614.GX1212@decibel.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: configurability of OOM killer  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 06:42:07AM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 08:45 +0600, Markus Bertheau wrote:
>
> > What about allowing shared_buffers to be only greater than it was at
> > server start and allocating the extra shared_buffers in one or more
> > additional shm segments?
>
> Sounds possible.

If we build that, it's probably not a far stretch to just allocate
shared memory as a number of smaller segments; that would allow us to
grow as well as shrink.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect  decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Hiroshi Saito"
Date:
Subject: Re: The question of LOCALE at the time of a regression test.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: GSSAPI and V2 protocol