-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:04:53 +1300
"Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej.groups@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 01/02/2008, Tony Caduto <tony_caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com> wrote:
> > The part about the BSD license is bogus. A BSD license is the most
> > desirable of any Open Source license and gives you the right to use
> > PostgreSQL in your commercial apps without worry.
> While I'm a big fan of the BSD license (for varied reasons) I think
> that OpenSource hardliners like RMS would argue that the BSD license
> is *NOT* in the true spirit of OpenSource *BECAUSE* of what you list
> as a bonus of it ... the locking down of benefits reaped from
> OpenSource not getting back into the stream.
RMS wouldn't make any such argument at all. His argument would be
centered around FREE not OpenSource software.
Joshua D. Drake
>
>
> Cheers,
> Andrej
>
>
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHonjaATb/zqfZUUQRAjfrAKCZu2KZigaCrNT6c9nbuAFYImRhdQCeI4uT
2gdMn7CA9XExIynw5mFogBs=
=pqTR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
