Re: OT - pg perl DBI question - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: OT - pg perl DBI question
Date
Msg-id 20080129180726.GF26594@crankycanuck.ca
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: OT - pg perl DBI question  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: OT - pg perl DBI question  ("A.M." <agentm@themactionfaction.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:14:28AM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
>
> I wouldn't trust that library or anything that depends on it if I were
> you.  It's been unmaintained for a *very* long time.

Because code rusts when it's sitting around on a hard drive?

Pg.pm doesn't get much attention, I agree, but I've actually never run into
a (n undocumented) bug with it.  Also, for simple Perl access for
Postgres-dedicated use, DBI can be a little heavyweight.

A


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Hart
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer?
Next
From: Willem Buitendyk
Date:
Subject: Analyze Explanation