On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 09:27:08PM +0000, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 04:09:45PM +0000, gordan@bobich.net wrote:
>>> That's just it - I don't think any user-land libraries would
>>> actually be required. One of supposed big advantages of MySQL is
>>> it's straightforward replication support. It's quite painful to
>>> see PostgreSQL suffer purely for the sake of lack of marketting in
>>> this department. :-(
>>
>> The "straigtforward" replication support in MySQL is seriously
>> broken.
>
> I am not arguing that it isn't! :-) I am merely trying to implement
> something at least as good (or rather, no more broken) for
> PostgreSQL with a minimum of effort.
In that case, use one of the existing solutions. They're all way
easier than re-inventing the wheel.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
