> > >>>
> > >>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/catalog-pg-shadow.html
> > >>
> > >> Wow -- why is it recommended? pg_shadow stopped existing on 8.1, so
> > >> it's almost three releases out of date. Is the search engine using the
> > >> 8.0 index?
> > >
>
> Understand that the recommendations are keyword based... ie if you search on
> pg_shadow, it's quite likely you would want the above page.
I rather think you'd want something that's not 404.
> > > no I don't think so iirc the "recommended" stuff is actually coming from
> > > the docbot search database (ie the database of the irc bot). The
> > > websearch should be fully up2date but I'm not sure when the docbot
> > > database was last synced ...
> >
>
> not a question of sync issue... the bot on irc was still using that link as of
> this afternoon (when I saw the initial post in this thread on advocacy and
> then updated the irc bot)
Oh..
Well, the sync stuff is stil an interesting question.
> > Yup, that's correct. And the fulltext stuff certainly seems to be doing
> > things right.
> >
> > Rob - whatever happened to setting up a scheduled job to sync the docbot
> > stuff?
> >
>
> Let's pretend I was waiting for the move to the new server and the 8.3 updates
> to get done. Now that we have it, I'll see what I can do to push that
> forward.
Touché.
When you do, please go ahead and commit the missing schema stuff to svn :P
/Magnus
