Re: count(*) and bad design was: Experiences with extensibility - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: count(*) and bad design was: Experiences with extensibility
Date
Msg-id 20080109171309.GF28750@crankycanuck.ca
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: count(*) and bad design was: Experiences with extensibility  ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:03:59AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
> And if, for some god forsaken reason, you need to operate on that
> number, there's always "lock table"...

Yes.  You could also store the data in ISAM :-P

> I feel dirty. :)

You should.  Go wash your brain out with soap.  LOCK TABLE indeed.

A


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: quick question abt pg_dump and restore
Next
From: "Josh Harrison"
Date:
Subject: Re: quick question abt pg_dump and restore