Re: ECPG and bison - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: ECPG and bison
Date
Msg-id 20075.1034967072@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ECPG and bison  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: ECPG and bison  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> writes:
>> those now, you can, because I assume your bison 1.50 output will get
>> into CVS.  I have bison 1.50 here too.

> The changes are there already, I just have to fold the ecpg.big branch
> into HEAD.

Probably you should refrain from doing that until Marc installs 1.50
at postgresql.org, else the nightly snapshots will be broken, to no
one's advantage.

Marc, can you do something about installing bison 1.50 soon?

(Guess I'd better get it loaded on my own machines, too...)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: optimizer question
Next
From: Jason Tishler
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres Windows Native Port