-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:50:29 -0500 (EST)
Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> wrote:
> > With PG 8.2 and 8.3, is it still pretty much limited to 8 cores
> > making 2 of the quad core Xeons redundant or detrimental?
>
> Where'd you get the idea 8 cores was a limit? As cores go up
> eventually you run out of disk or memory bandwidth, but how that
> plays out is very application dependant and there's no hard line
> anywhere.
Actually this is not true. Although I have yet to test 8.3. It is
pretty much common knowledge that after 8 cores the acceleration of
performance drops with PostgreSQL...
This has gotten better every release. 8.1 for example handles 8 cores
very well, 8.0 didn't and 7.4 well.... :)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHaWoJATb/zqfZUUQRAgMeAJ9RS7BLAowXpJTbXuufJhIATj9gaACgrH6x
LRVDPbyIvn71ANra2yiXmgY=
=8QVl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
