Em Tuesday 11 December 2007 15:47:27 Joshua D. Drake escreveu:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:37:27 +0000
>
> Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> > "Gregory Williamson" <Gregory.Williamson@digitalglobe.com> writes:
> > > Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any
> > > attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
> > > may contain confidential and privileged information and must be
> > > protected in accordance with those provisions. Any unauthorized
> > > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are
> > > not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply
> > > e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
> >
> > FWIW this would be another item on the netiquette FAQ.
>
> O.k. but the above is *not* user controlled. I think the community
> needs to suck it up and live with that.
And the good thing is that the indiscriminate use of those disclaimers tend to
make them void when really needed. After all, if there are lots of
legitimate and intended posts to public mailing lists, who would guess
something that is there shouldn't be? :-)
Always a good reference: http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
--
Jorge Godoy <jgodoy@gmail.com>
