-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 17:26:11 -0500 (EST)
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > Tom and you disagreed. I understand the reasoning and I don't
> > actually disagree with the thought process but I think the thought
> > process is flawed. I do not believe people only look at the release
> > notes for "wow cool". I believe they look at them to see who
> > deserves kudos in this release.
>
> OK, that was clear to me. You are saying based on the criteria we
> have used in the past our system of feedback works (good), but the
> criteria used isn't 100% agreed.
>
> My point is that it isn't that I am too subjective and closed to
> feedback on adding/removing items, but rather the policy used isn't
> open for feedback; but it really is. Should we open discussion of
> changing the policy?
>
That sounds reasonable.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHXb93ATb/zqfZUUQRAvdXAJkBuL3h1ZRA3j40JBJ9V1pWglF1uACdFBYr
e+234rZRsjT+2AqFoyoQ2Nc=
=33Td
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
