Re: Training Recommendations - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Robert Treat
Subject Re: Training Recommendations
Date
Msg-id 200712031352.49852.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Training Recommendations  (Usama Munir Dar <usama.munir@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Sunday 02 December 2007 15:26, Usama Munir Dar wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 November 2007 11:20, Usama Munir Dar wrote:
> >> EnterpriseDB (www.enterprisedb.com), ofcourse
> >
> > lame :-P
>
> Have you or anyone you know tried the training offerings? or you think
> its lame because i top posted , which of course would be a very poor
> criteria , not to mention completely unrelated, so i definitely think
> its not the reason. i would love to hear whats wrong with it so we can
> work on its improvement
>

What I thought was lame was that you, being someone who works for EntepriseDB,
suggested EnterpriseDB as a solution, with no mention of the other training
options available.  Now one guy doing this isn't such a big deal (though it
is still poor practice), but if every training company we're to do this I
think you can see how it doesn't do much for helping the public discourse. Of
course I probably would have let the whole thing slide, but you top posted,
so...

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Paul Lindner
Date:
Subject: Re: Training Recommendations
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: Dealing with big tables