Re: TB-sized databases - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Bill Moran
Subject Re: TB-sized databases
Date
Msg-id 20071128082716.91bbad9c.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TB-sized databases  (Matthew <matthew@flymine.org>)
Responses Re: TB-sized databases
Re: TB-sized databases
Re: TB-sized databases
List pgsql-performance
In response to Matthew <matthew@flymine.org>:

> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Pablo Alcaraz wrote:
> > it would be nice to do something with selects so we can recover a rowset
> > on huge tables using a criteria with indexes without fall running a full
> > scan.
>
> You mean: Be able to tell Postgres "Don't ever do a sequential scan of
> this table. It's silly. I would rather the query failed than have to wait
> for a sequential scan of the entire table."
>
> Yes, that would be really useful, if you have huge tables in your
> database.

Is there something wrong with:
set enable_seqscan = off
?

--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/

wmoran@collaborativefusion.com
Phone: 412-422-3463x4023

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Matthew
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST indexing tuples
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST indexing tuples