-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:39:42 -0500
Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org> wrote:
> Unfortunately, the only way to make things deterministic (or to get
> from "near real time" to "*GUARANTEED* real time") is to jump to
> synchronous replication, which is not much different from 2PC (Two
> Phase Commit), and which is certain to be prohibitively expensive
> across a WAN.
>
> At this point, I tend to get visions of Tom Cruise telling Jack
> Nicholson, "I want real time replication!", and getting the response:
> "You can't HANDLE real time replication!"
You're damn right I ordered real time replication!
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHSzrvATb/zqfZUUQRAqfwAKCA+p8tzxIQJGrnEm8F7D5H0HbkCQCfTk7J
D0mtHxYmVhXVAfbvUYMO6tw=
=0m/Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
