Re: Terminal width for help output - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sam Mason
Subject Re: Terminal width for help output
Date
Msg-id 20071119213932.GP1955@frubble.xen.chris-lamb.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Terminal width for help output  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 06:56:06PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Do we care to maintain a maximum width for programs' --help output (and psql's 
> > \?)?  I think 79 characters was once a recommendation (or perhaps 72), but we 
> > have a couple of violations either way, which I'd like to fix, but what to?
> 
> 79 is perfect IMHO.  It would be great to ask translators to preserve
> the constraint too.

I thought that <79 was good because if output was copied/pasted into an
email that didn't fold lines nicely then output wouldn't get immediately
mangled.

 Sam


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Guillaume Lelarge
Date:
Subject: Re: Terminal width for help output
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: elog levels for _redo failures