-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:20:30 -0800
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> The analogy makes less than zero sense. We didn't take psqlODBC code.
> We started from scratch. When ODBCng started, psqlODBC was dead and no
> development had happen for a long time, psqlODBC was also libpq based
> which we wanted nothing to do with.
>
> (yes I am fully aware that psqlODBC no longer needs libpq except for
> auth methods).
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
Bruce pinged me on IRC about this and rightfully pointed out that he
was just trying to analyze the situation. I want to publicly apologize
to Bruce as I obviously came off hostile.
So hats off with a bow, I am sorry. I should have taken a breath before
I responded.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHPmuxATb/zqfZUUQRAmS9AKCcD7F8vhpgec6fHfb/X53IpV5hSACcCzwE
Sb8VkXrvDjwDVGbmnFTEvxI=
=uUxa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
