Re: Curious about dead rows. - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: Curious about dead rows.
Date
Msg-id 20071114165823.GW16041@crankycanuck.ca
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Curious about dead rows.  (Jean-David Beyer <jeandavid8@verizon.net>)
Responses Re: Curious about dead rows.
List pgsql-performance
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:53:17AM -0500, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> that I run only one at a time, or leaving psql running. But as I understand
> it, psql does not bother with transactions, and besides, I normally just do

No, every statement in psql is a transaction.  Even SELECT.  Every statement
under PostgreSQL runs in a transaction.  When you type "SELECT (1)", the
server implicitly adds the BEGIN; and END; around it.

> into my application so that the statistics counters will not count previous
> UPDATEs and ROLLBACKs when the main program that I intend and believe to do
> only INSERTs is running. It will make those statistics easier to read than
> having to subtract previous values to get the changes.

Yes.

> Well, it will not work because I must be superuser (i.e., postgres) to
> execute that, and if I am, I cannot read the input files. I will do it

You could grant superuser status to your user (or just connect as postgres
user) for the time being, while debugging this.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan
Old sigs will return after re-constitution of blue smoke

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Jean-David Beyer
Date:
Subject: Re: Curious about dead rows.
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: Curious about dead rows.