On Tuesday 13 November 2007, Jeff Frost <jeff@frostconsultingllc.com> wrote:
> Ok, Areca ARC1261ML. Note that results were similar for an 8 drive RAID6
> vs 8 drive RAID10, but I don't have those bonnie results any longer.
>
> Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
> --Random- -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP
> /sec %CP 14xRAID6 63G 73967 99 455162 58 164543 23 77637 99
> 438570 31 912.2 1 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random
> Create-------- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
> -Delete-- files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec
> %CP 16 12815 63 +++++ +++ 13041 61 12846 67 +++++ +++ 12871 59
>
>
> Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
> --Random- -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP
> /sec %CP 14xRAID10 63G 63968 92 246143 68 140634 30 77722 99
> 510904 36 607.8 0 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random
> Create-------- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
> -Delete-- files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec
> %CP 16 6655 16 +++++ +++ 5755 12 7259 17 +++++ +++ 5550 12
OK, impressive RAID-6 performance (not so impressive RAID-10 performance,
but that could be a filesystem issue). Note to self; try an Areca
controller in next storage server.
thanks.
--
The global consumer economy can best be described as the most efficient way
to convert natural resources into waste.
