On Wednesday 14. November 2007, Leif B. Kristensen wrote:
>On Tuesday 13. November 2007, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>Leif B. Kristensen wrote:
>>> On Monday 12. November 2007, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> >I'm thinking that we need to warn everyone about:
>>> >1) They need to use 8.3's pg_dump, not the old version, to upgrade
>>>
>>> Isn't there a chicken-and-egg problem here? On my Gentoo system, I
>>> have always been forced to uninstall the old version before
>>> upgrading to a new version.
>>
>>That's a Gentoo shortcoming, nothing more.
>
>I've started a thread about it in the Portage & Programming section of
>forums.gentoo.org:
>
>http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-615494.html
>
>I hope that someone more knowledgeable than me will be able to
>contribute in bringing this issue to the attention of the Gentoo
>developers, and hopefully work out a solution. Sure, there are other
>Gentoo users than me around here?
FYI, I've filed a bug report on bugs.gentoo.org:
"This is not quite a bug, but rather an approaching challenge. See this
thread on forums.gentoo.org
[http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-615494.html], in which I was
asked to file a bug report. Concerning the upcoming PostgreSQL upgrade
from 8.2 to 8.3, it's imperative that Gentoo implements an adequate
transition procedure. Blocking the old version will create
a 'chicken-and-egg' situation where you are left incapable of upgrading
your existing databases. According to the developers, it's important
that a dump of the old database should be done with the new 8.3 version
of pg_dump. See this thread
[http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2007-11/msg00051.php] on
pgsql-advocacy for some details."
The bug id is [https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199142].
--
Leif Biberg Kristensen | Registered Linux User #338009
http://solumslekt.org/ | Cruising with Gentoo/KDE
My Jazz Jukebox: http://www.last.fm/user/leifbk/
