Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation
Date
Msg-id 200711111455.lABEt5J23840@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-docs
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I am still desperately unhappy with the choice to put the contrib docs
> > where they were put.  They are by no stretch of the imagination part of
> > the "SQL Language", and there is no defense for having inserted them
> > into the middle of the part, in front of substantially more widely
> > interesting information such as concurrency control.
>
> I think we need to decide where they will go;  they are easy to move.
>
> > Furthermore, labeling them "Standard Modules" is somebody's flight of
> > wishful thinking --- if they were installed by default, they'd deserve
> > such a title, but that's not happening any time soon.
>
> That name needs adjustment too.

How about "Additional Supplied Modules"?

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication Feature Matrix
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Contrib docs v1