Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation
Date
Msg-id 200711110514.lAB5ExN19424@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-docs
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> >> BTW, why are neither contrib/dblink nor contrib/spi included in the
> >> conversion?
>
> > I see dblink:
> >     http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/dblink.html
>
> Oh, in that case the question is why the contrib/db/doc/ files are
> still there.

Because I thought only READMEs were converted.  Removed now.

> > I assume spi wasn't done because it is just examples of SPI usage.
>
> The .example files are fine, but what about the two README files?

My guess is they were not converted because they are READMEs that
related to the examples.  We can convert them if people want.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation
Next
From: Albert Cervera i Areny
Date:
Subject: Re: Placement of contrib modules in SGML documentation