On Thursday 01 November 2007 00:44:16 Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > Perhaps both these considerations dictate providing another command or a
> > special flavor of \l instead of just modifying it?
>
> I've seen no argument made why \l should print this info at all.
>
> regards, tom lane
What about \l+ ?
The '+' is already in \d, so it's a known "feature", and then people wanting
more info from \l can use \l+.
--
Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak@officenet.no>
Senior Software Developer / Manager
------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
OfficeNet AS | The most difficult thing in the world is to |
Karenslyst Allé 11 | know how to do a thing and to watch |
PO. Box 529 Skøyen | somebody else doing it wrong, without |
0214 Oslo | comment. |
NORWAY | |
Tlf: +47 24 15 38 90 | |
Fax: +47 24 15 38 91 | |
Mobile: +47 909 56 963 | |
------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
