Re: Datum should be defined outside postgres.h - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Meskes
Subject Re: Datum should be defined outside postgres.h
Date
Msg-id 20071027172824.GA9579@feivel.credativ.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Datum should be defined outside postgres.h  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 11:04:19AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, that's surely a good idea, but there'll have to be some
> negotiation to figure out how to do that.  None of those files are
> currently designed with any thought of being compilable outside the
> backend environment.
> 
> The hard part really would be sharing gram.y and scan.l, especially in
> view of the fact that we need different actions.  Do you have a plan
> for doing that?

Not yet, no. My only plan was to start tackling the topic by trying to
get scan.l into ecpg (seems to be easier than gram.y) and see what ecpg
needs and what not. 

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Filip Rembiałkowski"
Date:
Subject: Re: URGENT HELP about 'duration' stats
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)