On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:45:14 -0400
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > We develop and commit like normal *until* the community feels there
> > is enough for release. Then we announce a feature freeze.
> >
> >
>
> No, I think this is hopeless on several grounds. First, it increases
> uncertainty. People need to be able to work towards a target. Second,
> there will always be a temptation to "just squeeze in killer feature
> X".
Well that flows into that checkpoint idea I think.
>
> I think there is some virtue in Simon's suggestion, provided that
> adequate reviewer resources are available. That might mean you need
> to put on your fundraising hat and raise some reviewer sponsorship
> money.
Did someone say money? ;)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
