Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Date
Msg-id 20071023100735.1b67e6ff@scratch
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:45:14 -0400
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:

>
>
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > We develop and commit like normal *until* the community feels there
> > is enough for release. Then we announce a feature freeze.
> >
> >
>
> No, I think this is hopeless on several grounds. First, it increases
> uncertainty. People need to be able to work towards a target. Second,
> there will always be a temptation to "just squeeze in killer feature
> X".

Well that flows into that checkpoint idea I think.

>
> I think there is some virtue in Simon's suggestion, provided that
> adequate reviewer resources are available. That might mean you need
> to put on your fundraising hat and raise some reviewer sponsorship
> money.

Did someone say money? ;)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>


--
     === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/        UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL performance issues