Re: BUG #3667: Job scheduling with Greenplum fails - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Dave Page
Subject Re: BUG #3667: Job scheduling with Greenplum fails
Date
Msg-id 200710152254130000@3036129777
Whole thread Raw
In response to BUG #3667: Job scheduling with Greenplum fails  ("Jon Roberts" <jon.roberts@asurion.com>)
Responses Re: BUG #3667: Job scheduling with Greenplum fails
List pgsql-bugs
> ------- Original Message -------
> From: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
> To: "Roberts, Jon" <Jon.Roberts@asurion.com>
> Sent: 15/10/07, 21:19:04
> Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3667: Job scheduling with Greenplum fails
>
> On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 10:42 -0500, Roberts, Jon wrote:
>
> > Like I said in the email, I think the best solution is to put the code in a
> > function.  However, after I inserted a total of 25 jobs, the difference is
> > more noticeable and my sql is better in terms of cost and total time.
>
> You're missing a few key points:
>
> - this isn't the PgAdmin hackers list, so you're asking in the wrong
> place ... go to www.pgadmin.org and go from there. This is the standard
> PostgreSQL bug list and you haven't shown any bug with standard
> PostgreSQL.
>
> - PgAdmin 1.8 is almost released so you may have missed the boat
>
> - pgAdmin is trying to work with other PG variants, so a reasoned
> argument, in the right place, may help.

A change has been applied for GP compatibility. It will be in pgAdmin 1.8.

Regards, Dave

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #3667: Job scheduling with Greenplum fails
Next
From: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Date:
Subject: Re: Deferred FK / PK deletion problems