Re: Back-patch support for python 2.5? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Back-patch support for python 2.5?
Date
Msg-id 200710141918.58900.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Back-patch support for python 2.5?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Back-patch support for python 2.5?
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> I noticed that two of the buildfarm members are failing the 8.1
> branch because they're trying to build plpython with python 2.5.  To
> get that to work, I think we'd need to back-patch these two fixes:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-11/msg00165.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-04/msg00043.php
> Is that worth doing?  Should we go further back than 8.1?

I find these patches a bit excessive for backporting, especially 10 
minor releases into the branch.

Those who need Python 2.5 can use PostgreSQL 8.2.  I consider that to be 
a new feature.  The fact that the buildfarm exercises other 
combinations isn't evidence of a practical need.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Gokulakannan Somasundaram"
Date:
Subject: Re: Including Snapshot Info with Indexes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Back-patch support for python 2.5?