Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
Date
Msg-id 200710082046.l98KkQj28574@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > > http://blogs.netapp.com/dave/2007/08/oracle-optimize.html
> > 
> > Not a whole lot of technical content there, but pretty interesting
> > nonetheless.  I *think* that the issues we're seeing are largely in the
> > NFS client-side kernel code, so bypassing that stack as Oracle is doing
> > might eliminate the problem.  Of course, there's a sizable amount of
> > code to be written to do that ...
> 
> Yeah.  Next step we will be writing our own malloc.

I assume there should be a ;-) in there because we already have our own
malloc (palloc).

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Added the Skytools extended transaction ID module to contrib as
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea