Chris Travers wrote:
> IMO, certain decisions, such as name changes, should not be made
> democratically. They should be made by the body which is responsible
> for governing the project (though democratic feedback can and should be
> a part of the process). *If* the core team wanted to endorse such a
> name change, then there would be a call for volunteers.
>
> So here is my only concern: If the project changes names, it is going
> to require a lot of grunt work. We do not want this work to cause
> delays in future versions of the software. In my estimation, this may
> draw out the transition time by months or even years. However, this is
> not a bad thing because it means that there is greater community
> awareness that the change is happening and more time to transition the
> advocacy efforts.
There seems to be a lot of valid concern about having manpower for this.
I am willing to take the lead and form a team to accomplish this goal if
we decide we want it. I did the Win32 port so this should be doable.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
