Carlo Stonebanks wrote:
> >> It sounds like you will need a huge lot of vacuuming effort to keep up.
> Maybe you should lower autovac scale factors so that your tables are
> visited more frequently. A vacuum_delay of 40 sounds like too much
> though.
> <<
>
> Does autovacuum not impede performance while it is vacuuming a table?
It causes I/O. Not sure what else you have in mind. vacuum_delay
throttles the I/O usage, at the expense of longer vacuum times.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
