Kris,
> But that benchmark was run with a different caching implementation than
> the wrapper version, so I'm not sure how that's relevant. When Sun
> chose to use unpublished and unreviewed code for the benchmark they got
> themselves in a little bind and I'm not sure it's our job to bail them
> out by publishing and advertising code that we're not confident in.
This isn't for *Sun*, it's for PostgreSQL. Do you have any idea how many
times a month I field the question "Is there a benchmark for PostgreSQL?"
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
