Heikki,
> See the discussion here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2007-07/msg00137.php
> continuing in August here:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2007-08/msg00006.php
I understand why it's a wrapper. I don't understand why the wrapper isn't at
jdbc.postgresql.org. Putting it on pgfoundry, completely separate from all
the JDBC drivers, is pretty much a guarentee that nobody will ever download
it.
Or is it moving to jdbc.postgresql.org once it's tested?
Just so everyone is clear on why this is important & urgent ... we published a
benchmark[1] using the caching driver, which is the only published benchmark
PostgreSQL has. This benchmark has generated a huge amount of interest in
PostgreSQL as an alternative to Oracle[2], and is very important to driving
the adoption of PostgreSQL *especially* amoung J2EE developers. So it would
be nice to see the caching wrapper represented as "official" unless there's
something technically wrong with it.
[1]http://www.spec.org/jAppServer2004/results/res2007q3/jAppServer2004-20070703-00073.html
[2]http://www.informationweek.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201001901
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
