Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date
Msg-id 20070903163928.GC10282@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Bruce Momjian escribió:
> Oh, one more thing.  I think it is illustrative to look at the areas we
> _didn't_ change when we went from "Postgres95" to "PostgreSQL":  the
> super-user name and the backend binary name.  Those were kept as
> "postgres", and I remember no questions about why those are "postgres".

Well, that's easy: those correspond to "postgresql" truncated to 8 chars ;-)

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)