Bruce Momjian escribió:
> Oh, one more thing. I think it is illustrative to look at the areas we
> _didn't_ change when we went from "Postgres95" to "PostgreSQL": the
> super-user name and the backend binary name. Those were kept as
> "postgres", and I remember no questions about why those are "postgres".
Well, that's easy: those correspond to "postgresql" truncated to 8 chars ;-)
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.