Re: [PATCH] Lazy xid assingment V2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [PATCH] Lazy xid assingment V2
Date
Msg-id 20070901025130.GY8046@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Lazy xid assingment V2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> I note that pg_description defines xid_age as "age of a transaction ID,
> in transactions before current transaction", and I'm content to stick
> with that definition.  Even if it does force consuming an XID.  I'm not
> sure that we could devise a comparably succinct description of any of
> these other proposed behaviors, nor that we should even consider
> changing that description.

Hmm, what happens if somebody calls 
select age(xmin) from bigtable
?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Florian G. Pflug"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lazy xid assingment V2
Next
From: August Zajonc
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lazy xid assingment V2