Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date
Msg-id 20070829204412.GS7911@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)  (Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
Ron Mayer wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > There _will_ be confusion, work
> > for package maintainers, nasty upgrade problems with oldbies who say,
> > "Oh, I don't want Postgres; I want the SQL-engine one," and edits to
> > the manual.
>
> For those people, perhaps we rename "postmaster" to "postSQLmaster"
> so they don't get too confused and can still see that SQL's in there
> somewhere.

Actually, the daemon got renamed -- it's not called "postmaster"
anymore, nowadays (8.3) the name is "postgres".  The old name still
works though.

--
Alvaro Herrera                          Developer, http://www.PostgreSQL.org/
"Y eso te lo doy firmado con mis lágrimas" (Fiebre del Loco)

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Robert Bernier
Date:
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Next
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)