On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 08:00:42AM -0500, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> >you can try to use "distinct on".
> I considered that as well, but couldn't think of a way to return more
you're right and i was wrong. i simply missed the word "two" in original
question. sorry.
depesz
--
quicksil1er: "postgres is excellent, but like any DB it requires a
highly paid DBA. here's my CV!" :)
http://www.depesz.com/ - blog dla ciebie (i moje CV)
