Re: Integrated perc 5/i - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Decibel!
Subject Re: Integrated perc 5/i
Date
Msg-id 20070816224059.GR54309@nasby.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Integrated perc 5/i  (tyrrill_ed@emc.com)
List pgsql-performance
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 01:30:11PM -0400, tyrrill_ed@emc.com wrote:
> Hi Miki,
> by 40%.  I have not tried RAID 10 so I cannot help you there.  My
> suggestion is test both RAID 5 and RAID 10, and report back to us what
> you find.

Unless you're running something like a data warehouse, I'd put a real
low priority on testing RAID5... it's rarely a good idea for a database.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby                        decibel@decibel.org
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)

Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Integrated perc 5/i
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Indexscan is only used if we use "limit n"