Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [mmoncure@gmail.com: Re: [GENERAL] array_to_set functions] - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Decibel!
Subject Re: [mmoncure@gmail.com: Re: [GENERAL] array_to_set functions]
Date
Msg-id 20070808171844.GI20424@nasby.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [mmoncure@gmail.com: Re: [GENERAL] array_to_set functions]  (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>)
Responses Re: [mmoncure@gmail.com: Re: [GENERAL] array_to_set functions]  (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:03:34PM -0500, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> Personally, I think expandarray is more appropriate and its
> functionality probably more generally useful, as it identifies the
> array indices as well. Note you can also rename the columns.

Sure. My point is that we should have a way to convert arrays to sets
and back in the backend.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby                        decibel@decibel.org
EnterpriseDB      http://enterprisedb.com      512.569.9461 (cell)

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Decibel!
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC for default heap fillfactor
Next
From: Michael Glaesemann
Date:
Subject: Re: [mmoncure@gmail.com: Re: [GENERAL] array_to_set functions]