> ------- Original Message -------
> From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
> To: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
> Sent: 04/08/07, 17:56:32
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki
>
> Yes, in fact it is. It is a complete pain in the butt in comparison to
> editing a wiki. If I want a page added to the .Org I have to:
>
> A. Understand CVS
> B. Understand HTML
> C. Understand patch
Rubbish. You send the text to -www.
Using a wiki for a public website looks completely unprofessional and gives the impression of a small organisation
withoutthe resources to do things properly.
Implemented in the manner being suggested leaves us with little editorial control over what is published. I'm not so
muchconcerned with deliberate vandalism but with ensuring all published content is factually correct, non-libellous,
andconsistent with the projects aims and past decisions on what we should or shouldn't publish.
Regards, Dave
