On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 01:44:23PM -0300, Bruno Rodrigues Siqueira wrote:
> EXPLAIN
> ANALYZE
> select
> to_char(data_encerramento,'mm/yyyy') as opcoes_mes,
> to_char(data_encerramento,'yyyy-mm') as ordem from detalhamento_bas
> where
>
> data_encerramento >= '01/12/2006' and
> data_encerramento < '01/02/2007'
>
> GROUP BY opcoes_mes, ordem
> ORDER BY ordem DESC
>
> ****************************************************************************
>
> QUERY PLAN
> Sort (cost=219113.10..219113.10 rows=4 width=8) (actual
> time=10079.212..10079.213 rows=2 loops=1)
> Sort Key: to_char(data_encerramento, 'yyyy-mm'::text)
> -> HashAggregate (cost=219113.09..219113.09 rows=4 width=8) (actual
> time=10079.193..10079.195 rows=2 loops=1)
> -> Seq Scan on detalhamento_bas (cost=0.00..217945.41 rows=2335358
> width=8) (actual time=0.041..8535.792 rows=2335819 loops=1)
> Filter: ((data_encerramento >= '2006-12-01
> 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone) AND (data_encerramento < '2007-02-01
> 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone))
> Total runtime: 10079.256 ms
>
> Strange!!! Why does the index not works?
It's unlikely that it's going to be faster to index scan 2.3M rows than
to sequential scan them. Try setting enable_seqscan=false and see if it
is or not.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel@decibel.org
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
