Re: index over timestamp not being used - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers
Subject Re: index over timestamp not being used
Date
Msg-id 20070725133512.GA19159@mail.planetcobalt.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: index over timestamp not being used  (Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On 2007-07-25 Mario Weilguni wrote:
> Am Dienstag 24 Juli 2007 schrieb Tom Lane:
>>> I thought the to_char/to_date/to_timestamp functions were intented
>>> for this purposes
>>
>> No, they're intended for dealing with wacky formats that the regular
>> input/output routines can't understand or produce.
>
> Really? I use them alot, because of possible problems with different
> date formats. 20070503 means May 3, 2007 for germans,

Actually, no. 20070503 is the condensed form of the ISO international
calendar date format (see ISO 8601). German formats would be 03.05.2007
or 3. Mai 2007.

Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
--
"The Mac OS X kernel should never panic because, when it does, it
seriously inconveniences the user."
--http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn2004/tn2118.html

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Mario Weilguni
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
Next
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers