Is this done or should it be kept for 8.4?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote:
> I just noticed that there are a number of places (mostly GUC assignment
> hooks) that use IsTransactionState() to decide if it's safe for them to
> do catalog lookups. This seems pretty bogus because IsTransactionState
> will return true in an aborted transaction. I'm not sure there's any
> actual bug because of other constraints on when GUC updates occur, but
> it sure looks like trouble waiting to happen.
>
> We could fix this either by changing the definition of
> IsTransactionState() or by introducing another test function with
> a different name. Any thoughts which is preferable?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
