Re: - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re:
Date
Msg-id 20070625235209.GG7531@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re:  (Ed Tyrrill <tyrrill_ed@emc.com>)
List pgsql-performance
* Ed Tyrrill (tyrrill_ed@emc.com) wrote:
> Yes, work_mem was set to 128MB for all runs.  All settings were the same
> except for the change to default_statistics_target.  I'm certainly
> memory constrained, but giving 2GB to one one session doesn't allow
> other sessions to do anything.  Possibly when we upgrade to 16GB. :-)

You might consider a smaller increase, say to 256MB, to see if that'll
switch it to a hash join (and then watch the *actual* memory usage, of
course), if you're looking for performance for this query at least.

Yeah, 2GB is what I typically run on our data warehouse box, which is a
nice dual-proc/dual-core DL385 w/ 16GB of ram. :)  The annoying thing is
that I can still run it out of memory sometimes, even w/ 16GB. :/

    Thanks,

        Stephen

Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Ed Tyrrill
Date:
Subject: Re:
Next
From: Ed Tyrrill
Date:
Subject: Re: