Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints test results - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints test results
Date
Msg-id 200706131138.04097.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints test results  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greg,

> However TPC-E has even more stringent requirements:

I'll see if I can get our TPCE people to test this, but I'd say that the 
existing patch is already good enough to be worth accepting based on the TPCC 
results.

However, I would like to see some community testing on oddball workloads (like 
huge ELT operations and read-only workloads) to see if the patch imposes any 
extra overhead on non-OLTP databases.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Controlling Load Distributed Checkpoints
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately