On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 09:56:44PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> AFAIK, most other compilers delete their output if it's not valid. Is
> there any particular reason why ecpg doesn't do this?
No, not really. Sometimes it comes handy to see what was already
processed, but you're right, it's not what I would expect from a
compiler either.
Any objects changing this behaviour?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
