Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #3326: Invalid lower bound of autovacuum_cost_limit - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #3326: Invalid lower bound of autovacuum_cost_limit
Date
Msg-id 20070607165403.GS3664@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #3326: Invalid lower bound of autovacuum_cost_limit
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > But this is misleading (started postmaster with good value, then edited
> > postgresql.conf and entered "-2"):
>
> > 17903 LOG:  received SIGHUP, reloading configuration files
> > 17903 LOG:  -2 is outside the valid range for parameter "autovacuum_vacuum_cost_limit" (-1 .. 1000)
>
> > Note how it still says the range is -1 .. 1000.
>
> Can we redefine things to make zero be the "disabled" value, thus
> keeping the range of valid values contiguous?

That would be another solution ... though it would be different from the
valid value for autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay (on which 0 is a valid
value).  Also it would be a different value from previous versions.

I don't think either of these is a showstopper, so let's go for that if
nobody objects.

--
Alvaro Herrera                          Developer, http://www.PostgreSQL.org/
<inflex> really, I see PHP as like a strange amalgamation of C, Perl, Shell
<crab> inflex: you know that "amalgam" means "mixture with mercury",
       more or less, right?
<crab> i.e., "deadly poison"

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately
Next
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] BUG #3326: Invalid lower bound of autovacuum_cost_limit