Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > This has been saved for the 8.4 release:
>
> I think it should be dropped entirely. The argument against was that
> it complicated the code in a non-performance-critical path, and that
> argument isn't going to be different next time.
I only kept it for 8.4 because I was worried it might be needed for HOT
performance. Are we sure that is not the case because that is why it
was originally proposed.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +